Methodological aspects of the structure of cognitive processes in content identification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2024-7-2Keywords:
cognitive processes, memory, attention, perception, thinking, imagination, content, identificationAbstract
The article discusses the methodological aspects of research on content identification. It presents a literature review on the psychological phenomenon of cognitive processes that highlight key features of the identification process. The article defines the main approaches to understanding each individual cognitive process involved in content identification. It reports the perspectives of different scholars on memory, attention, perception, thinking, and imagination. The article describes each feature of the classification individually and defines the term ‘cognitive process’. Based on the literature review, the article outlines the primary components of the ongoing research methodology. The object of the study is cognitive processes, while the subject is cognitive processes of schoolchildren in identifying content generated by neural networks. The article details the diagnostic methods for cognitive processes. These methods yield comprehensive results, tailored to the specific needs of this research. The employed toolkit facilitates the quantification of various cognitive aspects: attention (Proofreading Test; Landolt Test; Gorbov-Schulte Table); memory (Wechsler Memory Scale); imagination (Masselon Test; Wartegg Test). Additionally, the dominant criteria were identified for perception (Representational System Bias Test; Leading Modality Test) and thinking (Thinking Profile, InQ Thinking Styles). Overall, the presented toolkit can be used to diagnose cognitive processes and contribute to the preparation of dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Sciences, field 5.12.1 Interdisciplinary Research of Cognitive Processes.Published
2024-11-30
Issue
Section
Статьи
How to Cite
Andryushkin, A.S. and Proskuryakova, L.A. (2024) “Methodological aspects of the structure of cognitive processes in content identification”, Герценовские чтения: психологические исследования в образовании, pp. 20–26. doi:10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2024-7-2.




